Buckie
I'll start with you.
How many times do I need to say what your agenda is? Cape Verde's development from the undiscovered place you loved, your failing to open a business there due to finance and red tape, your family putting deposits down on VV then being unable to complete due to unfortunate changes in circumstances. You wanyed a piece of the action, but it didn't work out for you, now you are bitter and twisted. You display this by yourself and members of your family swarming CV forums, getting thrown off some, posting under numerous names, starting your own forum that failed, even hiding your identity due to libel problems. Is that all not a bit obsessive and odd?
I'd like you to cut and paste where I've ever said Tecnicil are doing things right? I will however say that claims made by yourself and Rumple of such outstanding bills, and bills having never been paid are way off the mark. Firstly, from my point of view, I have been in Tecnicil's offices and been through things like water and electric bills. Secondly, are you really both that naive to think if bils hadn't been pid for so long and so much was owing that Tecnicil would still be being supplied? I just ask you to think about it as sensible adults before you make such ridiculous statements.
Buckie, as for your ownership comment, yes, of course I would reply with 'that old chestnut'. You will post ANYTHING that you think will hit back at Tecnicil for what has happened to your family. Remember your 'VV to be used as social housing, and resort fees to double in 5 years', I could go on and on.
I stand by everything I say about you, agenda, bitter, twisted, obsessive, a bit sad so need forum conversation. How else do you explain all the posts and comments from you, when you claim to have no involvement?
Rumple
Let's start with your investment. If you are happy with what you have invested in then great. Personally I think the route you have gone down is a disaster. Why? Because even by your own admission you have no idea on what returns regarding yield that you will achieve and you have a capital asset that has decreased and is decreasing further in value. In my opinion there would have been many better choices closer to home, but I imagine sales talk about returns and emerging markets drew you in.
As for your comments regarding VV, I maintain that previously you were out of order and misleading with your comments regarding the communal pools and gardens.
However, I agree with you that Tecnicil should have got someone else in to manage the resort, and still believe that would be better for all involved.
You say that Tecnicil would not go without a huge fight, I disagree, I think they see the benefit of the resort running better as they have lots of units still in their hands that they could make available for rent, or have a better chance of selling if the resort was thriving.
I think that the bigger issue is who will take it on, on terms that are agreeable to both parties.